Wednesday, February 29, 2012

"Attack of the Mantises" An Analysis of "Pick Up Lines Will Save the World" By Dave Barry

    
    

  In this article, "Pick Up Lines Will Save the World," Barry's sarcastic insight of the male's role on 'making the first move' claims that not only do men try their best to sound enraged and intellectual, but also that women tend to be a little too picky when it comes to their pick up line preference. His use of strong ethos and logos throughout the passage support his claim that even though men can have an odd approach when attempting to speak to a female, they also try their best, but because of how they come off they are just down casted and laughed at.

 While Barry realizes that women must endure "childbirth," "wait in line for public-restroom stalls," and have a "psychotic obsession for shoe color," he believes that "nature has given males the heaviest burden of all." The exaggeration here is very great because if any man was forced to carry a baby for nine months, experience mood swings, have gut wrenching cramps during their period, and endure crazed rollercoaster emotions that are brought on by life in general, than I believe that statement would have never been thought. These two things, women's struggles and men's pick up lines, do not come close to being on the same playing field.

  Barry believes that the burden of making the first move is the heaviest, even compared with women's struggles, because they have a risk of being "shot down." Women have a risk of death when it comes to childbirth and they also have to endure pain for an extended amount of time consistently throughout each month. Now, when compared to that, how can that be the biggest burden? I do not agree with these statements because many women make the 'first move,' but women are forced to endure painful things physically, so why can't men take a little initiative on this? Must women do everything?

     Pulling in to his logos, Barry supports his beliefs with an example of the mistreatment of males by the female species from an episode of Discovery Channel. Basically from this show, he manages to suggest that in nature, whatever "species" it is, the male makes a fool out of himself while the female acts uninterested and snickers to her "girlfriends" about this ghastly experience. He used several examples which related his point to different aspects of nature. These examples, even his use of ethos when describing his personal experience, showed that not only was he supported by men in general, but by nature as well.

   From Barry's view, men have it the worst because they are instantly shot down and made a fool out of by women who are unappreciative of just how hard men try. Well, in tying into some men's true intentions, he says that women should cut men some slack and accept their ridiculous pick up lines because they say then in hopes that women will of "mate" with them in the next fifteen minutes to "enable the survival of the human race." If women cut did cut men slack on their choice of introduction, then what would happen? Because really, if a man did care about you, would he be one of the ones that says something along the lines of, "You're Smoking' Hot?" The reason they are embarrassed when they get shot down is probably because they are either not used the word no, or hit on loose women who don't know the word no, therefore he is either creepy or he misinterprets you as a loose woman. Men create this unnecessary uproar about how men are treated, but if they would treat women with respect when approaching them then maybe they would receive a more positive response to their lame pick up lines.


Tuesday, February 14, 2012

'Kill 'Em! Crush 'Em! Eat 'Em Raw!'

How convincing is football's comparison to war? How does it appeal to logos? 
- In football, you have routine's, plays, drills, and the mindset to take out your opponent. The logic of this game is to win and to crush your opponent. In war, you have moves, drills, routine's and an overall goal to take out your opponent. If in football that means hurting someone, than that's ok, because the logic of it is it's all part of the game...right/ 


What sports, other than football, have a militaristic side? 
-Well, football is the major one. You tackle, have crushing and high impact drills, and most of all, a lot of injuries and even a random death. But, other sports all have a little piece of that, but not near as much as football. Soccer has the view of almost a mental fight. Although you cannot body slam one another, you can use your mental 'fighting' skills to outwit your opponent by turning quickly or ducking, or doing a very impressive move to get the ball. Baseball has a little bit of this aspect also because you have to pay attention to others actions and moves and basically think on your toes as to how far or what your "range" would be to get the ball to this one person. But overall, nothing beats this view when it comes to football. 


How does John McMurtry's personal experience give him credibility to his argument? 
-Anyone who talks about a topic that they have personally experienced obviously gives them a little more room to elaborate on the experience and details on the topic. For John, his personal experience gives him the surreal effects on the positive and negative aspects of the sport of football. If he had never played football, but still chose to right about it,his writing wouldn't have as much credibility. So, by writing about a personal experience, his ethos is created. 


Does celebrity's association with sports enhance it or tarnish it? 
-Just like anything, it depends on the person and their character.If a famous person is involved in a charity, it could enhance it, or it could tarnish it. If the person is honestly playing the sport for fun, and with good character and sportsmanship, than it enhances it and the overall effect. But, if the player uses it to single out the "misfits" and makes them feel as if they are unequal, then that tarnishes it. The name calling, singling out, and overall displacement of individuals tarnishes it, what doesn't is the players who stand up against that kind of playing and attitude.